Posting your rating...
Seven Fathoms Premium rum

Seven Fathoms Premium

Cayman Islands | Gold

5.8/10 (20 ratings)
Easily consumable in a bind


Rate Seven Fathoms Premium

Tap to Rate
Click to Rate

Have an opinion about this rum?

Signup to rate this rum!

20 Seven Fathoms Premium ratings

Sort by: Popularity | Date | Rating

F8f12fc298c5de7a647a90e38b9e2b99.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 4 years ago by Hari from United States with 11 ratings

The Caymans is where I had my first quality rums not mixed with coke. I enjoyed them so well I have started searching for the best rums available. This isn't it. Not bad and not hard to drink straight, but just nothing stands out with this one.

7e98d7caf5a77c78ab8fc8866a317c66.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 5 years ago by Richard k from Canada with 5 ratings

One of the easiest rums you can ever drink not much to it for taste or knows we're on the pallet I really don't know what to say

F3beae1491c40d47e28200a2a5c9e7f3.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 5 years ago by tftowner106 from Canada with 23 ratings

light, not complex, but very smooth. Almost no flavour to speak of. Nothing going on. Will have to try it with some coke.

3d47552e1a3e6da6f980f4fc9d8295d6.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 7 years ago by Don Tucker from United States with 194 ratings

My wife bought me a bottle of this for Christmas. It is very tasty straight up. I like the barrel aging under the sea. It is very unique. A great sipping rum, but not cheap.

0b3eb738cf54231f7e6ab963742fb7f1.png?s=40& avatar

Posted 4 months ago by mamajuana from United States with 148 ratings

This rum looks more impressive in color somehow in the bottle. When its poured its almost a pale straw color in the glass. Its not impressive in any aspect really. Its not the worst rum I have ever had but certainly not better than a 14 dollar bottle of Bacardi 4 year. This is a terrible rum to say the lease with no redeeming qualities and given I believe I paid about 60 dollars or so for this bottle 5 years ago its a terrible waste of money. Sipping this is like drinking a 2 year aged rum in my estimation. It is said their aging method under water would not really add anything because of the fact that the barrels are covered in a condom like covering preventing the barrel from breathing. Serious improvements need to be made here. This review is for batch 66.

5ee808222d5e82f74944814fc7ba2b35.png?s=40& avatar

Posted 8 months ago by Russ from United States with 70 ratings

I like that it seems that no sugar has been added so that's a plus. It's also a nice interesting story on how it's made. A pretty good sipper that goes down fairly well but nothing that makes it stand out.

D4e2a830fef561c31ae87d32a021abd1.png?s=40& avatar

Posted 12 months ago by Paperanalyst from United States with 1 rating

This is a nice rum. Very mellow over the tongue. Not too sweet and little after yaste

1be4adae1f2a6e785267fd6ed3745b5d.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 1 year ago by Haemonculi from United States with 46 ratings

Good for sipping but not extraordinary by any means.

C9d0b093dc7890cf9031d38d01bb7ced.png?s=40& avatar

Posted almost 2 years ago by Tom from United States with 29 ratings

This rum was smooth but really didn't have any character to it. Would be worth adding a bottle to the collection just for the story behind it

Eabd880cb8be28e778fedd4a7915ec7b.png?s=40& avatar

Posted over 2 years ago by Jonathan Quintal from Canada with 44 ratings

Surprising taste, good for a whisky lovers transition, no signs of added sugar, almost a 7 but not a typical rhum taste, easy sipping, short aftertaste