Posting your rating...
Santiago de Cuba Extra Anejo 20-Year rum

Santiago de Cuba Extra Anejo 20-Year

Cuba | Aged

31 ratings
Now this is some good stuff


Rate Santiago de Cuba Extra Anejo 20-Year

Tap to Rate
Click to Rate

Have an opinion about this rum?

Signup to rate this rum!

31 Santiago de Cuba Extra Anejo 20-Year ratings

Sort by: Popularity | Date | Rating


Posted 4 months ago by Francois from France with 106 ratings

I like it is not too sweet for a Ron, nice nose but rest is very flat, almost watery, too bad it had a nice start


Posted over 4 years ago by Tomy from Romania with 423 ratings

It's a classic cuban style, not so sweet and great taste. A interesting aftertaste, perfect with an cigar.


Posted over 5 years ago by Norbert from Netherlands with 5 ratings

Wow, I like this one a lot. Awesome nose and taste, a long lingering finish. Not just sweet, I also sense a bit of soy, which gives a lovely contrast. A keeper!

Small 1ad53a03 9844 4e80 a54e 555a7b289a4c

Posted 1 month ago by Jimmy Cliff (PREMIUM) from United States with 276 ratings

I’ve been told this is the best of Cuban rum, so ready to give it a go. First taste neat, much smoother than Havana club but typical Cuban flavor. Not too sweet, great balances of spice notes and lingering depth.

Small rumrating

Posted 2 months ago by Milan from Slovakia with 60 ratings

When I spent 2 weeks in Cuba I felt in love into Santiago de Cuba 7 year old, after return I would like to try also something more old and smooth, but after try of this one older, not too cheap I was quite disappointed. Rum is good, but I expect bigger difference.

Small 49897d37 4ace 499e a67a 91d354ebedeb

Posted 3 months ago by Trotinete from Romania with 44 ratings

Geruch nach Walnuss, Zuckerrohr, sehr fein.
Im Geschmack findet man die Geruchsnoten wieder, plus getrocknete Früchte,
das ganze mit einer natürlichen Süße und ein wenig Alkohol im Abgang, sehr gefällig.

Fazit: bis jetzt der beste Santiago de Cuba den ich verkostet habe. 8+
Er ist ausgewogener als seine Brüder mit 11 und 12 Jahren, schmeckt besser, kann sich aber nicht so klar absetzen, besonders vom 11 Jahre alten, wohl weil dieser auch ein besonders guter Rum ist.

Wenn der Preis stimmt ist aber der „Santiago de Cuba Extra Anejo 20-Year“ in allen Punkten die bessere Wahl. Ich werde ihn sicher wieder nachkaufen.


Posted 5 months ago by Jukilicious from Finland with 4 ratings

Soft nutty smell with light first bite. Comes afterwards with some strength and vanilla and leaves nice aftertaste. Rather big tumbler than a nose glas to my taste. Strong recommendation.


Posted 1 year ago by Lerxst from Canada with 9 ratings

A decent rum, that's a little nicer than Santiago du Cuba Anejo, but at 9 times the price... not worth it.


Posted 1 year ago by martin jeppesen from Denmark with 247 ratings

Not a bad looking bottle to have on the bar. Really inviting nose with solid notes of muscovado sugar, camamelised and roasted nuts, cigar leaves, round oak and hints of liqourice and wooden lacquer. This one got things going on, but it feels well put together with all the notes meshing nicely.
The taste is bold and potent but retains a nice and semi dry elegance at the same time.
Notes of dark chocolat, mokka and well integrated oak flairs up in the mouth with a long finish, ending on spices and caramel.
There is a shade of sweetness to the taste but hydrometer tests show no sign of additives. This is definitely among the best cubans i'v had so far. The quality and characteristics would almost put this rum in the same ballpark as Appelton 21 and fleur de cana 25. Great.


Posted almost 2 years ago by Calmar from Russian Federation with 25 ratings

Цвет - Чёрный чай.

Аромат - Сдержанный. сладкий, пряный, баблгам, вяленая дыня, сухофрукты, молочный шоколад, ваниль,

Вкус - Мягкий, обволакивающий, дуб, сливочные ноты, кондитерская сладость, немного имбиря, карамель, цветочные оттенки.

Послевкусие - Лёгкое, согревающее, кисло-сладкое, лёгкие древесные нотки.

Вывод - Аромат весьма интересен, необычен, вкус/финиш, к сожалению, напрямую не развили эту тему и, к тому же, оказались слабее в сравнении с ним, но в целом мне очень понравилось.

Оценка - 9/10