Posting your rating...
Angostura Cask Collection Number 1 French Oak Cask 16-Year rum

Angostura Cask Collection Number 1 French Oak Cask 16-Year

Trinidad and Tobago | Aged

7.8/10(29 ratings)
Recommendable to most


Rate Angostura Cask Collection Number 1 French Oak Cask 16-Year

Tap to Rate
Click to Rate

Have an opinion about this rum?

Signup to rate this rum!

Advert Image

Advertisement | Go Premium to remove

29 Angostura Cask Collection Number 1 French Oak Cask 16-Year ratings

Sort by: Popularity | Date | Rating


Posted over 2 years ago by Andy Tee from Malaysia with 148 ratings

10 years in American oak casks before being transferred over to once-used French oak casks that previously held Cognac for the final 6 years.

N- Shy at first, initially get the cured ham with raisin and various dried nuts, then more power and weights shows up gradually, and the aged rum notes blossomed to fullness at the tail, expecting more French Oak influence but the cognac were not as prominent at this stage. (87/21)

P- French oak comes into play with abundance of fig, raisin and oak nuance, well integrated with touch of phenol, charred wood and sweet cedar note. Good 2nd cask influence. Would be great if the sugary at the tail can be contain. (87/21)

F- Medium-long, more obvious brandy coats with echoing waxy dried fruits, full and subtly spicy. (88/22)

Body/Balance- 87/21

Weighted Rate:- 85pt
— at The Rum Bar KL.


Posted 3 years ago by Chet from United States with 193 ratings

This is not your mommas rum. If you like good deep well balanced rum then this gem is for you. Very nice, perfect sweetness. Great flavors from start to finish.


Posted over 3 years ago by Peter from Slovakia with 74 ratings

pre mna prvy od angostura. sladkasti, celkom vyvazeny, ale nic specialne pre mna. rozhodne ale patri medzi dobre rumy. urcite nieje naskodu vyskusat


Posted over 3 years ago by Steven Atkinson from United Kingdom with 4 ratings

Nice sipping rum, you can really taste the oak flavour. Not as good as 1824 or 1787. But still highly recommended


Posted over 3 years ago by Sofie Mårtensson from Sweden with 40 ratings

En trevlig rum med mycket fat och lite sötma.......


Posted almost 4 years ago by Reto from Switzerland with 89 ratings

nod bad, but the Batch 1 was even better. what a pity


Posted almost 4 years ago by Axel from Germany with 89 ratings

I am so sorry! I tried the 1787 first and after this wonderful rum i tasted the batch 2. It is like tadting honey and after that tasting sugar water. It is surely a nice rum, but in comparison to 1787 it is no 2.!


Posted 4 years ago by vincent from France with 128 ratings

Le nez est plus sucré que le batch 1 (cerise, bonbon arlequin).
L’attaque est douce mais manque de complexité. En fait j’ai été déçu car j’attendais énormément de ce rhum, mais une fois en bouche il n’y a pas de magie qui opère, pas d’explosion de saveurs, il y a un arrière gout de cognac qui prend tout de suite le dessus et qui coupe toutes les saveurs du rhum. Ca crée une énorme frustration, la dégustation a les ailes coupées en plein vol. Ca reste un bon rhum mais je préfère largement la 1er version qui a plus de caractère. Comme tout angostura le final est très intéressant par sa longueur.


Posted 4 years ago by A. S. T. from United States with 6 ratings

candy flavored sweetness, clean and sharp, cool, a bit of medicinal nose,


Posted over 4 years ago by mistercoughy from United States with 239 ratings

This stuff has eight spoons of added sugar per liter - a preposterous amount - which explains why it tastes so damned sweet and uninteresting. I love authentic rums from Trinidad (e.g.,Caroni) but this juice has that insipid, flat mouthfeel and lack of complexity common to heavily sweetened rums. What a waste.