Posting your rating...
Angostura 1824 12-Year rum

Angostura 1824 rum is a blend of rums aged for at least 12 years in oak barrels. The aged rums are blended, re-casked, and upon maturity hand-drawn for bottling.

This rum is named and crafted in honor of Dr. Johann Siegart's founding of Angostura house in the city of Angostura, Venezueala in 1824. Angostura 1824 rum production is now based in Trinidad.

Rate Angostura 1824 12-Year

Tap to Rate
Click to Rate

Have an opinion about this rum?

Signup to rate this rum!


221 Angostura 1824 12-Year ratings

Sort by: Popularity | Date | Rating

Posted about 19 hours ago by Krille_8000 from Sweden with 20 ratings

This is very smooth and very sweet. Lot's of vanilla and caramel. There's some oak to it as well. It's a good sipper and probably great for drinks too.

Posted 2 months ago by LegallySmelf from United States with 23 ratings

Beautiful Spanish-style blended rum. Deep and complex but strong notes of vanilla throughout. It can change the profile of a drink in an incredibly positive way. Rum connoisseurs will find this a superb sipping rum and Tiki aficionados will find it the best liquor for a top-shelf pupule.

Posted 2 months ago by Digisquared from United Kingdom with 1 rating

Love the dark colour and the very smooth finish of this rum. The toffee flavour is definitely coming through, making it a lovely rum to have neat.

Posted 3 months ago by Marty from Czech Republic with 65 ratings

Will be... .

Posted 3 months ago by artnoir666 from Sweden with 8 ratings

When it comes to Angostura, stick with the well proven. 1824 is complex, but too smooky and devoid of any fruityness. Not worth the extra price!

Posted 4 months ago by Nickolai Birjoo from Trinidad and Tobago with 6 ratings

I love Angostura as a company, brand, and facet of history for the country I live in, but 1824 is the red headed step child of an otherwise tenured lineup of casked product. I drink all my alcohol (with few exceptions, but rules have to have those, right?) straight, no ice, no chaser of any kind, because I like the overall flavour of the rum, including the burn and aftertaste. This rum has a smooth (overly so for my tastes) body, almost no nose, and light burn in the tongue, none in the throat nor chest. The flavour man, it's killing me - it tastes like fermented Haw Flakes (look those up, they have a weird tangy punch that's unique to the candy and this rum) drowned in water with a smidge of Royal Oak added. Most of the palate is in the aftertaste, and if you chase rum like me for their invigorating burn of sugar with a mélange of seasoned oak smatterings throughout, then I cannot recommend this rum - if you prefer a sipper that's so smooth it can be used in a hypothetical physics environment (with assumed no air resistance), then yes, this is the rum for you. It's a rum that plays more to its aftertaste than its nose, so be prepared for that at the very least.

Posted 5 months ago by Jurjen from Netherlands with 19 ratings

This is a real nice rum. Rich taste, a little sweet, not too strong with a mild burn. I like it a lot!

Posted 5 months ago by Eanousa from United States with 54 ratings

I have longed for the Cast Collection Number 1, but no more. This does not completely replace it's unbelievably velvety flavor, but this exhibits 85% of the characteristics of that gorgeous batch.

Posted 5 months ago by Michael N from United States with 69 ratings

This is an ok example of a 12 year rum. It is smooth and clean. It does not have much in the way of flavor, depth, or aroma. It’s not the worst I’ve tried, and not the best. Just average. Would expect more from a $60 bottle.

Posted 6 months ago by Chris from Germany with 11 ratings

First impression: fruity, soft, raisin and a long finish.
Nose: orange, plum, raisin, vanilla
taste: smooth, round, full in the mouth
perfect rum and everybody darling in the tasting.

Posted 6 months ago by Ryan from United States with 22 ratings

Tried this rum at a restaurant because it did not have any of my go to rums. I actually liked this rum a lot. It was balanced and not overly sweet. I don’t like sweet rum. I’ll buy this one again.

Posted 7 months ago by Cindymneman from Curaçao with 2 ratings

Was a quite expensive bottle, but we did not like it straight, on the rocks, mixed...

Posted 7 months ago by ripperussr from Czech Republic with 96 ratings

Caramel and vanilla in the aroma. Quite sweety start of the body and almost no tail.

Posted 7 months ago by je_farley from United States with 100 ratings

A wonderful nose that hints at things to come. Perfect neat with a full range of flavors with a slight burn with some sweetness. Great for sitting in front of the fireplace.

Added just a touch of coke to try later and enjoyed that immensely. Changed the profile slightly but still had a broad flavor profile.

Overall this is a better sipper that the 1912 and will get a spot in my bar.

Posted 7 months ago by Vicke from Sweden with 62 ratings

Nice sipper with lots of flavours. Sweet but not to sweet, vanilla, tobacco, butterscotch and with an hint of smokiness.

Posted 9 months ago by M.R.J. from Finland with 203 ratings

Odd taste notes, tobacco etc. Clearly an essence-bomb, despite of Angostura always saying they do not put in essences (well, lab tests say otherwise). sweetened. Unnatural vanilla. Thin base spirit. No thanks. Has gotten from not so nice to truly awfully poor in its lifetime. Weak.

Posted 9 months ago by Snookerman from United Kingdom with 121 ratings

First, I found this way better than the disappointing 1919, which I found oily and lacklustre. This has a lot more oak, molasses and fruit (possibly mango and banana). On the negative side, the added sugar seems to dampen the experience rather than add anything at all to it. I also found it had a slight burn on the aftertaste.

Posted 9 months ago by Underdog from United States with 17 ratings

Deep amber color. Molasses and vanilla on the nose. Upon sipping, you are hit with a sweetness that mellows out to oak. Then there is a subtle bite ate the back end as burnt banana and toffee exits the nose.

Posted 9 months ago by ShaneD from United States with 14 ratings

Wonderfully smooth, complex, and reserved. Flavors of oak, leather, and tobacco make this an excellent sipper and it's certainly worth making it last at the price point. It would be a travesty to mix this with Coke or even make something basic like a dark n' stormy with this rum. In fact, I currently use it only in my zombie (with a generous 1.5 oz pour) which is a kick in the face best enjoyed by lovers of rum in the first place. It takes a lot for me to really view a rum as something primarily to be enjoyed neat (as a tiki cocktail enthusiast) and this is the first rum that really makes me feel guilty for mixing.

Posted 9 months ago by Edwwa from Lithuania with 22 ratings

Rum starts from dark chocolate taste and goes to oak. Didn't liked this angostura.

Posted 10 months ago by mmciesielski from United States with 22 ratings

This one has a decent flavor to it, a bit sweet, but on the rocks it is very good. Better straight than mixed.

Posted 10 months ago by Dan-Fix from Sweden with 113 ratings

Oaky, a bit harsh and a bit sour. Interesting and different rum. But let it breathe for a long time before the first sip. A liked it but this rum is different in a good way.

Posted 10 months ago by Stadaik from Greece with 38 ratings

Tried this after the bartender made an intro. Weak color. Not to sweet. Balanced body. A little bit sweet aftertaste but you are loosing quickly. Always with ice and dont mix it

Posted 11 months ago by Janne68 from Sweden with 13 ratings

Mjuk rund smak, behaglig sötma. Lite smörig kanske men överraskande god faktiskt, en rom man kan softa gott med när som helst.