Thanks so much for submitting a report. It has been emailed to the Rum Captain and will be actioned shortly.
Although listed here as "Villa Rica 23-Year" there is nothing on the bottle indicating the "23" is indicating years aging. All it says is "23 years" and "superior aged rum". Ambiguous. I hope some day there will be standards for labeling rum. The tag attached to the label doesn't clear things up. In part it reads "created with distilled sugar cane juice and aged since the 20th century in ancient European white oak toasted barrels". I want to know what they consider "ancient". Did they dig up the barrels at some archaeological site in France or Britain? The tag also reveals it originates from Veracruz, Mexico. My bottle was identified (handwritten) as "Bottle: 128/240 Barrel No. VR49". The bottle is rather elegant. Tall and slender...a little taller than typical rum bottles with gold leaf lettering.
The rum itself is a nice amber color and has a sweet, fruity aroma in the snifter. The flavor starts off sweet which is unusual for rum made from cane juice...I expected something a little drier...which makes me wonder if this rum has been sugared and by how much. I get hints of prunes and raisins in the flavor along with a bit of pepperiness and a decent burn which fades swiftly leaving a drier finish but lingering raisin flavor remains. The oak barrels have imparted their flavor in the rum giving it a slight bitterness from the tannins.
I have to disagree with some of the reviewers saying it's a terrible rum. It's not. It's a fairly decent rum that seems to have been sugared somewhat apparently to ease some of the harshness. It doesn't have the character nor smoothness of a rum aged for 23-years in single oak barrels so I am of the opinion the labeling is misleading. I would expect a legitimate 23-year-old single-barrel rum would be far more expensive than the $30 USD I paid.
It's not as smooth of a rum as one would expect from an aged rum but it's not overly harsh either. It's on the borderline of sipper/mixer. Personally I would prefer it as a mixer rather than a sipper but I can see it being enjoyed by some neat or on the rocks. Definitely worth a try. Don't let the very negative reviews here keep you from at least trying it. I've had some incredibly bad rums (see my reviews at the "1" level for examples) but this is far from being one of them.
I've been a fan of aged rums and tried many. This is the worst one ever! It was so bad it was exciting. Just like daring a friend to taste something so bad it's traumatic.
Smell: Burned chemical treated wood
Taste: Charcoal, soot, and aged shoe leather
Aftertaste: Yeah, the shoe leather taste lingers just for fun!
This is a smooth rum made with sugar cane juice in charred oak barrels. It's got a nice array of enticing notes that work together well. Leather, tobacco, vanilla, chocolate and dried fruit. Rather dry rum that goes down nicely with little heat. Another rum which is a staple at Total Wine and More stores.
Enjoyed straight or mixed...price is about $40
As of this review, this rum has an even mix of ratings between a 1 and a 10. I find this rum to be decent, but different from other rums.
Somewhat sweet with vanilla, but also has charred oak, leather, tobacco, chocolate and a touch of pepper. It's unique, and I can see why the scores are so varied. I expect this rum to get a lot more very high and very low scores. I'm in the middle on this.
Smooth and nice, my wifes new favorit rum, difficult to find in Europe....
Next to blackmask.. worst rum I have tasted. A waste of caloric intake and a sad day for rum. Almost threw it away like black mask rum..
Mahogany color with amber glints and golden glints. Clean, crystalline, shiny, of strong body and slow drip. Interesting on the nose where the aroma of the barrel predominates. Then delicate notes of vanilla, almond and hazelnut. Fine touches of chocolate, coffee and tobacco, decorated with fine notes of caramel.
Taste: Congruence between aroma and flavor, balance between acidity and alcoholic grade, of kind character and refined to the palate.
Velmi zajimava lahev
Vůně zajímavá lehce ovocna
Chuť se zdá být s počátku příjemná, ale po chvilce se vrací do zklamání.
štiplavější, a osobně mi přijde jako nevyzráli..ikdyž má 23 let
Looks good, smells good, it even tastes good but just in the matter of a second..everything disappears right away..It's just flat.
Bought this due to an in store recommendation. It's not as bad as the low scores here but also not as good as the high. It does mean towards a molasses forward flavor which are NOT my preferences for rum. But it is not too far forward. The flavors are kind of a mash up, and not necessarily complimentary of one another. It's a complex flavors profile but not necessarily in a good way. It is a heavy and dark rum. I threw ice on it to thin it out. Not one to sip neat. But I think this might go well with ginger beer, but I wouldn't mix it with coke. Again, a bit of an anomaly here. It is relatively smooth, and has that going for it. Also, I don't detect that there are added sugars to this, as it's more subtley sweet. At the end of the day, I won't buy again. Too many other great rums out there, I'll pass on this one.
This is a truly delicious aged rum with great complexity and spice. Its
aging has created a smooth integrated alcohol that supports the flavours
without dominating them
Beautiful appearance appealing smell, nice flavour profile with a nice
long finish.Very well- crafted rum revealing the qualities of the making. Top class
product, stimulates all sense, Packaging could be improved.
This came highly recommended by the nice young lady at Total Wine. I had never heard of it, and figured we'd give it a try. Poured neat, it has a light bouquet of fruity tootsie rolls. It as a thin mouth-feel, and tastes like it would be the aged upgrade of the cheap rum that you might get at a hotel's free happy hour. Not anything like the sipper I expected from the recommendation or reading the bottle.
A Very Nice Dark Spiced Rum, better than my favorite Jonas Curse. I like many of the comments about the “age” question. That is, is this rum really aged for 23 years? To me, it does not taste like many of the fine, aged rums I have tried. The rum is nicely bottled but I do not wish to pay for fancy packaging and this rum is not a good value. If given the choice, I will most likely try something else in the future.
I have tasted over 500 aged rums over the past 15 years and I know the Mexicans can produce some amazing tequila's, but this supposedly 23 year rum tastes horrific, leaves a very bad afterburn and you will reek tobacco leaves and one month old coffee for the rest of the day. You can't even mix this with Coke, it's that bad.
The top 10 worst rums I have ever tried:
1. Barbancourt 4y / 8y / 15y
2. Bounty Dark Rum from Fiji
3. Stroh 40 / 80
4. Plantation Pineapple Stiggin's Fancy
5. Villa Rica 23y
6. Mocambo 15y / 20y
7. Captain Morgan different variations
8. Don Papa 10y / 15y
9. Bacardi flavored "rums", all of them
10. Kraken rums
Невкусный. Пахнет нормально, но вкус портит всё впечатление
Not what I expected, but not as other wrote, I think iI gonna like it. It is a single cask Rum and therefore very special. Numbered bottle (mine is 106/257 VRS3) and probably collector items.
It is a rum with a special taste, I can't fine out if I like it or not.
Dark, dark amber in the bottle. Darker than any extra aged rum or bourbon I've experienced. A lot of anise/black licorice on the nose with almost a medicinal tar or asphalt as well. Will have to visit again. Hard to really pinpoint but something is very much "off". The unpleasantness follows through onto the pallet and finish. Think Beemans gum that fell onto fresh paved asphalt. Purchased at the recommendation of the spirit steward at Total Wine. Going to see they'll exchange or at least taste to see if this particular barrel (it is a single barrel rum) was off. Initial tasting out of a Glencairn glass, neat, and let rest for 15 min before tasting.