5.7/10
(104 ratings)
Sort by: Popularity | Date | Rating
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted 2 years ago by kmpiast from Poland with 41 ratings
Cheap good for coctails, without depth, better than bacardi, captain morgan. But on the other hand for that price I think Jameson whiskey is better way to go...
Final verdict: Maybe some day I will giv it another shot
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted 2 years ago by eddieo from United States with 95 ratings
Seriously, did they catch these bottles swimming in an enchanted swimming hole in the DR? The ABV is weak for the style, and it tastes like candy water. They could do much better with a little more TLC with the product, instead of focusing so much on the brand.
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted 2 years ago by ProfessionalFloridian from United States with 13 ratings
Harsh with no depth. I don't have much to offer here. I don't have any ideas as to what they're doing wrong, just that is in fact wrong. Too many great options out there to settle for this.
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted over 2 years ago by Doug from Canada with 21 ratings
The aroma and taste of this rum has no other flavor than alcohol. Definitely not for drinking straight or with water. Maybe ok for a mixer but I didn't even wish to try anymore of it.
Posted over 2 years ago by Jagsroy from Canada with 181 ratings
Having had Brugal Anejo, Brugal XV and Brugal 1888, it was only a matter of time before I got my hands on a bottle of Brugal Extra Viejo. This version of the Brugal line sells for $35 CAD in my area and I would guess it is most likely used as a mixer. In spite of the low rating on this site (5.9 from 78 ratings) I thought I would give it a try as a sipper rum as it is known to be very dry, with no sugar added.
This rum is dry indeed and while not a premium rum, it is nevertheless acceptable neat but much better rums are available for a few extra dollars. Would I drink this again? Yes. Will I purchase another bottle? Not likely.
Very good, but a little too sweet f
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted over 2 years ago by Hector from United States with 61 ratings
El sabor no es malo, es un poquito dulce y sabe mejor q el Brugal Añejo q sabe a tierra. No es uno de mis favoritos ya que al dia despues de tomar este ron me dio muy mala resaca y dolor de cabeza. Brugal tiene mejores rones q este.
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted almost 3 years ago by Frederick Lussier from Canada with 124 ratings
Un peu dure a boire seul, mais parfait pour les drink
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted 3 years ago by chris from Canada with 11 ratings
there's much better options from there, even from Brugal, I have heard much better from the 1888 if you want to try that instead !
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Posted 3 years ago by Regan from Canada with 75 ratings
ok i'll give it this smooth but something that i couldn't put my finger on was not right about this rum
thin and medicinal like it had a funny after taste that to me was off putting
gladly it was not me who bought the bottle ,lol
i will not run out to buy this rum it can stay on the shelf , i would much rather drink the Anejo
/40/065f5f/ffffff){kind=avatar}
Not bad 6 out of 10
Posted 4 years ago by Titomm from Canada with 64 ratings
Not bad, and while I prefer to sip my rhums, if I need some to mix, I choose this one, as it is not on par with other on the same price range. Not complex, not particularly pleasing.
Pas mal, et même si je préfère déguster mes rhums nature, si j'ai besoin d'un rhum pour un cocktail, je choisis celui-ci, car il n'est pas à la hauteur d'autres dans la même gamme de prix. Pas complexe, pas particulièrement agréable.
Signup to like this rating